Research Group Space
paco.garcia[at]ebd.csic.es
  • Evolvability meets biogeography: evolutionary potential decreases at high and low environmental favourability
  • Transgenerational effects of sexual interactions and sexual conflict
  • Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating
  • Model Systems, Taxonomic Bias, and Sexual Selection: Beyond Drosophila
  • Maternal sexual interactions affect offspring survival and ageing
  • Fertilization success
  • Phyll nymphs
  • Thonrnydev
  • Bull ant

About this space

Evolution unfolds in an ecological theatre. The context within which selection takes place is set not only by interactions between the organisms and abiotic factors, but also by inter- and intra-specific interactions. Sexual interactions are paramount in sexually reproductive species because offspring production is contingent on access to members of the other sex and on access to the other sex’s gametes. Furthermore, variation in the numbers of offspring produced and variation in the genetic quality of the progeny depends on interactions between the sexes. For instance, it may depend on mating choice criteria or on the particular genetic compatibility between mating partners. In all, sexual interactions largely determine the fitness of individuals (and populations). This implies selection acting on sexual interaction traits (including adaptations to outcompete rivals), which in turn raises questions about the genetic variation underlying these traits and the factors that maintain such variation in the face of selection. The main interests of the research group relate broadly to the evolutionary ecology of the interactions between the sexes, and includes the study of the causes and consequences of female multiple mating (polyandry), the estimation of genetic variation (heritability, evolvability) in sexually selected traits and life-history traits, the study of coevolutionary male-female adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict, the study of risk-spreading behaviour in the evolution of mating systems, and the study of male-driven trans-generational effects on offspring life-histories and their consequences for the evolution of sexual conflict. The research carried out by the group is question driven and predominantly follows empirical approaches using several model systems (mainly insects and other invertebrates). There are two broad questions that we try to address: What can we learn about evolution from studying sexual interactions? What can we learn about sexual interactions from studying evolution?

Latest News

  • State Plan Excellence

    New grant from the State Plan of R&D&i of Excellence. Our understanding of the causes and consequences of sexual conflict is hampered due to a lack of knowledge on a fundamental question: Does sexual conflict underlies the structure of socio-sexual networks and the ability of individuals to shape their social environment? This project will exploit the integration of experimental evolution protocols and evolutionary thinking with social network theory to address this question.

Latest Publications

Indirect genetic effects—everything is special, everything is important: a comment on Bailey et al
Garcia-Gonzalez, F.
2017
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arx144
A father effect explains sex-ratio bias
Malo, A. F., Martinez-Pastor, F., Garcia-Gonzalez, F., Garde, J., Ballou, J. D. & Lacy, R. C.
2017
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 284: 20171159
Evolvability meets biogeography: evolutionary potential decreases at high and low environmental favourability
Martínez-Padilla, J., Estrada, A., Early, R. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F.
2017
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 284: 20170516
Abstract

Understanding and forecasting the effects of environmental change on wild populations requires knowledge on a critical question: do populations have the ability to evolve in response to that change? However, our knowledge on how evolution works in wild conditions under different environmental cir- cumstances is extremely limited. We investigated how environmental variation influences the evolutionary potential of phenotypic traits. We used published data to collect or calculate 135 estimates of evolvability of morpho- logical traits of European wild bird populations. We characterized the environmental favourability of each population throughout the species’ breed- ing distribution. Our results suggest that the evolutionary potential of morphological traits decreases as environmental favourability becomes high or low. Strong environmental selection pressures and high intra-specific competition may reduce species’ evolutionary potential in low- and high- favourability areas, respectively. This suggests that species may be least able to adapt to new climate conditions at their range margins and at the centre. Our results underscore the need to consider the evolutionary potential of populations when studying the drivers of species distributions, particularly when predicting the effects of environmental change. We discuss the utility of integrating evolutionary dynamics into a biogeographical perspective to understand how environmental variation shapes evolutionary patterns. This approach would also produce more reliable predictions about the effect of environmental change on population persistence and therefore on biodiversity. 

Promiscuity
Garcia-Gonzalez, F.
2017
In: Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, (Vonk, J. & Shackelford, T. K., eds.). Springer.
The total opportunity for sexual selection and the integration of pre- and post-mating episodes of sexual selection in a complex world
Evans, J. P. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F.
2016
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29: 2338-2361
Abstract

It is well known that sexual selection can target reproductive traits during successive pre- and post-mating episodes of selection. A key focus of recent studies has been to understand and quantify how these episodes of sexual selection interact to determine overall variance in reproductive success. In this paper we review empirical developments in this field but also highlight the considerable variability in patterns of pre- and post-mating sexual selection, attributable to variation in patterns of resource acquisition and allocation, ecological and social factors, genotype-by-environment interaction, and possible methodological factors that might obscure such patterns. Our aim is to highlight how (co)variances in pre- and post-mating sexually selected traits can be sensitive to changes in a range of ecological and environmental variables. We argue that failure to capture this variation when quantifying the opportunity for sexual selection may lead to erroneous conclusions about the strength, direction or form of sexual selection operating on pre- and post-mating traits. Overall, we advocate for approaches that combine measures of pre- and post-mating selection across contrasting environmental or ecological gradients to better understand the dynamics of sexual selection in polyandrous species. We also discuss some directions for future research in this area.